Date of Award

2025

Document Type

Dissertation

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (EdD)

Department

Organizational Leadership

First Advisor

Phiip Pendley

Second Advisor

Martinrex Kedziora

Third Advisor

Bradley Tooker

Abstract

Purpose: This study explores the critical role of leadership and employee motivation in sustaining organizational effectiveness during times of disruption, focusing specifically on the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. It investigates how leadership styles and motivational theories evolve in response to heightened uncertainty, rapid operational changes, and emotional strain. Central to this purpose is understanding how adaptability, empathy, communication, and relational leadership practices help maintain employee engagement and ensure continuity within higher education institutions during crisis conditions.Methodology: A qualitative phenomenological methodology was used to capture the lived experiences of 10 human resource (HR) leaders representing public and private universities across the United States. The study integrates foundational motivation theories—Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs, Herzberg’s Two-Factor Theory, and McClelland’s Theory of Needs—with leadership frameworks including transformational and servant leadership. Semi-structured interviews were analyzed using MAXQDA software to identify patterns in how HR leaders supported, motivated, and guided employees from 2020 to 2022. This analytical approach synthesized theoretical and empirical insights, offering a deeper understanding of how leadership and motivational strategies were adapted to meet evolving human and organizational needs during the pandemic.

Findings: Seven major themes and 18 subthemes emerged from the data, illustrating the shift from traditional hierarchical leadership to relational, human-centered approaches. Findings show that empathy, transparent communication, and flexibility became the primary drivers of employee motivation. HR leaders acted as emotional stabilizers, balancing institutional demands with psychological safety while implementing wellness initiatives, flexible work models, hybrid schedules, and intentional recognition. Financial incentives were referenced less frequently, whereas intrinsic motivators—trust, compassion, collaboration, and belonging—proved essential in sustaining morale and engagement.

Conclusions: The research concludes that effective crisis leadership requires emotional intelligence, authenticity, and an adaptive, human-centered approach. The pandemic reshaped the role of HR in higher education, positioning HR leaders as strategic partners responsible for fostering resilience, maintaining stability, and supporting employee well-being.

Recommendations: Organizations should implement crisis-responsive leadership strategies that build emotional intelligence, strengthen communication, and promote cross-functional collaboration. Future research should examine long-term post-pandemic leadership practices and explore how institutions can cultivate resilience through ongoing professional development and crisis-readiness planning.

Share

COinS